|
Stuff Dreams Are Made Of Waking Life (2001) Directed by Richard Linklater; Reviewed by Mike Hertenstein
Even better, the style is entirely suited to the material. In
fact, director Richard Linklater says that while he had the idea
for this film years ago, he had to wait for a technology to
enable him to tell the story as he thought it should be told: and
the story is the quest for reality, the journey between dream and
waking, or, more precisely, the journey between dream and dream.
Just as the colors jump in and out of the lines, so the main
character (and viewer) jump in and out of dreams until we're all
pleasantly confused whether our experiences are real or a dream.
The actual story is a little thin, though the director insists
the narrative is there, even if it unfolds slowly. For most of
the film, an unnamed seeker merely wanders in and out of dreams
listening to people talk to him, trying to figure out what's up.
Plot is beside the point. Any excuse to hang out with all these
interesting people to hear what they have to say is fine with me.
And do they EVER talk: even moreso than the heavy non-stop verbiage that made
the director's earlier Before Sunrise such a pleasant excuse to listen
to stimulating conversation. We simply are thrust into the middle of one
rambling monologue after another, given in many cases by non-actors who
Linklater found facinating. The improvisational style of generating the
material, says the director, made for an extremely open mode of creation not
usual for big films. It all comes off improvisational, I should hasten to
add, but it's all so dense and relentless it's like we had the supreme luck
to catch some unforgettable speakers on a very good night.
One speaker worries about postmodern irresponsibility, and the consequent
abdication of personal authenticity and passion. Another is facinated by
language and symbolism, the difficulty in communicating emotions. One guy
rhapsodizes about the possibilities of the ongoing bio revolution, our chance,
so to speak, to grab evolution by the horns. This perspective is balanced by the
guy who says man is the creature who loves chaos and proves his point in a
disturbing way.
To be honest, I'm not exactly sure what the outpouring of ideas amount to --
whether they make for a unified philosophical perspective, or whether that
perspective expresses the opinion of the director. I'm not sure that's the
right way to view this film anyway, like a puzzle to decode. The effect of
philosophical overload had about the same effect on me as the violence in
Fight Club: I wasn't about to turn that film into a recipe for living,
but I sure appreciated the metaphysical wake-up call.
And that's the point: one leaves Waking Life with a sense of being
awakened to a world worth being awake for: along with a renewed passion to
stay awake, live responsibly, and remain open to both others and to wonder.
"This is absolutely the most exciting time we could have ever hoped to be
alive," says one character. "Things are just starting."
If I had to boil down the film to a general message,
it would be something along these lines: Hey, we ALL feel like
we're experiencing a great transitional moment in human history.
It's scary, yes, but why face the world feeling like the next
chapter has to be worse than what came before? Why not choose to
think it will actually turn out to be better?! The point of view
is optimistic without being utopian, a vibrant championing of
humanity rescued -- on the farside of the posmodern divide -- from the stale
ideology of humanism. And, despite the caveats one speaker has about
postmodernism, it's clear that whatever the next chapter consists of, it will
feature a new approach to reality, and an ability to be comfortable with
disunity: paradoxically, this might be the starting point for a new commonality.
Of course, all this optimistic blather rings just a little tinny
in the wake of September 11th. As if that tragedy could be compounded, I
find myself wondering -- as I've picked up a certain glimmer in more than
one recent film -- Is it possible that we were on the brink of a new Post
postmodern hopefulness when the terrorists blew the last
shards of trendy despair out of our lives?
If so, then such a change in cultural mood arrives not a moment too soon. It
remains to be seen whether any such new Will to Hope will carry us beyond the
nightmares of the post-WTC present into new dreams. But I guess that's the
personal responsibility of each of us: facing an unexpected next chapter that
looks very scary indeed, and refusing to believe it is the End of the World.
|